<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Consumers Only Using Browser Based Software</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jeffreylu.com/2009/04/08/consumers-only-using-browser-based-software/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jeffreylu.com/2009/04/08/consumers-only-using-browser-based-software/</link>
	<description>Banker Turned Operator</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 23:08:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey Lu</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffreylu.com/2009/04/08/consumers-only-using-browser-based-software/comment-page-1/#comment-300</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey Lu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 09:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffreylu.com/?p=250#comment-300</guid>
		<description>Thanks Andrew, very insightful.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I was thinking about the mobile platform as a caveat while I was writing so I was careful to make a distinction that I was talking about the PC.  It&#039;s so fast and easy to download mobile apps on new gen smart phones that I don&#039;t see downloading as a limiting factor to consumer usage.  Especially considering the fact that web browsers just aren&#039;t as sophisticated as their PC counterparts but it will be an interesting arena to track in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Andrew, very insightful.</p>
<p>I was thinking about the mobile platform as a caveat while I was writing so I was careful to make a distinction that I was talking about the PC.  It&#39;s so fast and easy to download mobile apps on new gen smart phones that I don&#39;t see downloading as a limiting factor to consumer usage.  Especially considering the fact that web browsers just aren&#39;t as sophisticated as their PC counterparts but it will be an interesting arena to track in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Choi</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffreylu.com/2009/04/08/consumers-only-using-browser-based-software/comment-page-1/#comment-299</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Choi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 07:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffreylu.com/?p=250#comment-299</guid>
		<description>very true.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;i ran into a dilemma on the mac b/c there&#039;s a lot of great desktop clients made for mac. What makes it hard is that mac programs are often well integrated into the OS. OS-integration CAN make things worth using over their web-app equivalent. i suspect though that we&#039;ll find web-apps more and more integrated into the desktop environment w/o having to install addons like google gears or adobe air.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;the issue also came up in the mobile scene when lifehacker was comparing the new mobile gmail and its imap equivalent on the iphone. &lt;a href=&quot;http://lifehacker.com/5202893/mobile-gmail-showdown-the-webapp-versus-a-mail-client&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://lifehacker.com/5202893/mobile-gmail-show...&lt;/a&gt; The new webapp for gmail is much better than the iphone app. but here again, an example limitation of the webapp is there&#039;s no &#039;email photo to gmail!&#039; option w/ your iphone photos. so more OS-integration needs to be forthcoming for a lot of web apps.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;nice blog btw</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very true.</p>
<p>i ran into a dilemma on the mac b/c there&#39;s a lot of great desktop clients made for mac. What makes it hard is that mac programs are often well integrated into the OS. OS-integration CAN make things worth using over their web-app equivalent. i suspect though that we&#39;ll find web-apps more and more integrated into the desktop environment w/o having to install addons like google gears or adobe air.  </p>
<p>the issue also came up in the mobile scene when lifehacker was comparing the new mobile gmail and its imap equivalent on the iphone. <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5202893/mobile-gmail-showdown-the-webapp-versus-a-mail-client" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5202893/mobile-gmail-show.." rel="nofollow">http://lifehacker.com/5202893/mobile-gmail-show..</a>. The new webapp for gmail is much better than the iphone app. but here again, an example limitation of the webapp is there&#39;s no &#39;email photo to gmail!&#39; option w/ your iphone photos. so more OS-integration needs to be forthcoming for a lot of web apps.</p>
<p>nice blog btw</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey Lu</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffreylu.com/2009/04/08/consumers-only-using-browser-based-software/comment-page-1/#comment-302</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey Lu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 06:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffreylu.com/?p=250#comment-302</guid>
		<description>Thanks Sam.  I was actually listening to your tumblr as I was writing this post so in a way, you contributed to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Sam.  I was actually listening to your tumblr as I was writing this post so in a way, you contributed to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffreylu.com/2009/04/08/consumers-only-using-browser-based-software/comment-page-1/#comment-301</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 06:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffreylu.com/?p=250#comment-301</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t get a lot of your techno-babble, but I got this one, and you&#039;re totally right.  If I have to download or install something, I&#039;m much less inclined to use it.  Nice post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#39;t get a lot of your techno-babble, but I got this one, and you&#39;re totally right.  If I have to download or install something, I&#39;m much less inclined to use it.  Nice post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey Lu</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffreylu.com/2009/04/08/consumers-only-using-browser-based-software/comment-page-1/#comment-288</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey Lu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 03:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffreylu.com/?p=250#comment-288</guid>
		<description>Thanks Andrew, very insightful.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I was thinking about the mobile platform as a caveat while I was writing so I was careful to make a distinction that I was talking about the PC.  It&#039;s so fast and easy to download mobile apps on new gen smart phones that I don&#039;t see downloading as a limiting factor to consumer usage.  Especially considering the fact that web browsers just aren&#039;t as sophisticated as their PC counterparts but it will be an interesting arena to track in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Andrew, very insightful.</p>
<p>I was thinking about the mobile platform as a caveat while I was writing so I was careful to make a distinction that I was talking about the PC.  It&#39;s so fast and easy to download mobile apps on new gen smart phones that I don&#39;t see downloading as a limiting factor to consumer usage.  Especially considering the fact that web browsers just aren&#39;t as sophisticated as their PC counterparts but it will be an interesting arena to track in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Choi</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffreylu.com/2009/04/08/consumers-only-using-browser-based-software/comment-page-1/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Choi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 01:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffreylu.com/?p=250#comment-61</guid>
		<description>very true.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;i ran into a dilemma on the mac b/c there&#039;s a lot of great desktop clients made for mac. What makes it hard is that mac programs are often well integrated into the OS. OS-integration CAN make things worth using over their web-app equivalent. i suspect though that we&#039;ll find web-apps more and more integrated into the desktop environment w/o having to install addons like google gears or adobe air.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;the issue also came up in the mobile scene when lifehacker was comparing the new mobile gmail and its imap equivalent on the iphone. &lt;a href=&quot;http://lifehacker.com/5202893/mobile-gmail-showdown-the-webapp-versus-a-mail-client&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://lifehacker.com/5202893/mobile-gmail-show...&lt;/a&gt; The new webapp for gmail is much better than the iphone app. but here again, an example limitation of the webapp is there&#039;s no &#039;email photo to gmail!&#039; option w/ your iphone photos. so more OS-integration needs to be forthcoming for a lot of web apps.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;nice blog btw</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very true.</p>
<p>i ran into a dilemma on the mac b/c there&#39;s a lot of great desktop clients made for mac. What makes it hard is that mac programs are often well integrated into the OS. OS-integration CAN make things worth using over their web-app equivalent. i suspect though that we&#39;ll find web-apps more and more integrated into the desktop environment w/o having to install addons like google gears or adobe air.  </p>
<p>the issue also came up in the mobile scene when lifehacker was comparing the new mobile gmail and its imap equivalent on the iphone. <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5202893/mobile-gmail-showdown-the-webapp-versus-a-mail-client" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5202893/mobile-gmail-show.." rel="nofollow">http://lifehacker.com/5202893/mobile-gmail-show..</a>. The new webapp for gmail is much better than the iphone app. but here again, an example limitation of the webapp is there&#39;s no &#39;email photo to gmail!&#39; option w/ your iphone photos. so more OS-integration needs to be forthcoming for a lot of web apps.</p>
<p>nice blog btw</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey Lu</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffreylu.com/2009/04/08/consumers-only-using-browser-based-software/comment-page-1/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey Lu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 00:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffreylu.com/?p=250#comment-60</guid>
		<description>Thanks Sam.  I was actually listening to your tumblr as I was writing this post so in a way, you contributed to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Sam.  I was actually listening to your tumblr as I was writing this post so in a way, you contributed to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffreylu.com/2009/04/08/consumers-only-using-browser-based-software/comment-page-1/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 00:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffreylu.com/?p=250#comment-59</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t get a lot of your techno-babble, but I got this one, and you&#039;re totally right.  If I have to download or install something, I&#039;m much less inclined to use it.  Nice post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#39;t get a lot of your techno-babble, but I got this one, and you&#39;re totally right.  If I have to download or install something, I&#39;m much less inclined to use it.  Nice post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
